|
|
| Feature | Winner |
| glasses comfort | both O.K., the score is even, I recommend the EyeFX for use with prescribed glasses and vice versa |
| glasses cable | the score is even, EyeFX cable slightly longer, VR-Joy cable slightly thicker |
| glasses durability | ask me again in 3 years, but I think in theory the bows of the EyeFX glasses can break off more easily |
| LCD-size | both very good, EyeFX wins |
| LCD-quality | the score is even - as far as I can tell |
| control buttons | both O.K., VR-Joy wins since the buttons are larger and easier to reach |
| available modes | both good, EyeFX wins since one of the modes can be used to turn 3D into 2D |
| resolution & refresh flexibility of line-blanker device | both good, VR-Joy wins |
| reliability of synchronization and line-blanking | VR-Joy works perfect, EyeFX works good, but I experienced problems in rare cases |
| image quality at high resolution/ high refresh | VR-Joy wins, EyeFX may catch up with hi-quality replacement cable |
| controller cable length | VR-Joy wins, Cable is much longer, controller can reside on the table in any case; the EyeFX cable can be replaced by a better and longer cable though |
| software bundle | EyeFX wins due to the full version of Z.A.R., VR-Joy has no software bundle |
| power supply | the score is even |
| design of glasses and controller | the EyeFX design looks more serious, conservative and professional, so if you want to impress somebody - go for it; the VR-Joy design on the other hand is modern, soft-shaped and small. |