Crystal Eyes Shutterglass question Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

stereo3d.com webboard » 3D Glasses, Helmets, Displays » Crystal Eyes Shutterglass question « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ray Moore (Heyyou2020)
New member
Username: Heyyou2020

Post Number: 1
Registered: 3-2007

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Saturday, March 24, 2007 - 7:20 am:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post

Hello all,

I just wanted to ask if anyone owns the new CE-3 shutterglasses or the workstation model + emitter. I currently own two pairs of eDimensional lcd glasses, one wireless and one wired, which seem to work great, but I'm always looking for something better, of course.

One reason I thought the Crystal eyes might work better is that their emitter would actually use the 3-pin din connector on my quadro FX1400 that I bought specifically for the quad-buffering feature. Right now I've got a DVI-VGA adapter hooked onto my video card with the ED dongle hanging off of that. Looks bizarre but it works, page flipping and all.

Anyway, all I'm trying to do is optimize my setup. The CE-3's are pricey but I'll lay down if it makes a difference.

Anyone?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Charles Arrants (Charles)
Junior Member
Username: Charles

Post Number: 34
Registered: 5-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Saturday, March 24, 2007 - 5:44 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post

I own both the consumer level eDimensional and the professional level Real D CE-3 shutter glasses. The comparison is somewhat like a Ford and a Cadillac -- both will do the job, one is an expensive luxury item.

The stereoscopic image looks essentially the same through both glasses, wired and unwired. The type of connection (DIN v. dongle) doesn't affect the synch output or stereoscopic image quality.

However,the costly CE-3's do have some advantages:
1. They're more comfortable for prolonged wearing periods.
2.Their lenses are larger, helpful if watching large (projected) images.
3. The frame design provides some shielding from ambient light, reducing ghosting when the head is turned.
4. The workstation version emitter that comes with the CE-3's has a longer range and wider IR field than the standard eDimensional emitter, helpful if you move around much with the glasses.
5. The frames are sturdier, less apt to break (but also much more expensive to replace if breakage occurs).

So, are the CE-3's worth the extra $$$$? Like any luxury, the answer is "yes," IF you can afford it and are willing to pay for the extra quality. However, I would recommend getting the CE-3's ONLY with their half-price trade-in offer ($495 for the glasses and emitter). I would NOT recommend paying the full $995 price, which is more than any shutter glasses are worth.

BTW: If you decide to get the CE-3's, don't buy replacement batteries from the Real D website at their rip-off price ($25 for a 10-pack). You can get the same battery pack elsewhere for about $5.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ray Moore (Heyyou2020)
New member
Username: Heyyou2020

Post Number: 2
Registered: 3-2007

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Sunday, March 25, 2007 - 7:49 am:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post

Thanks Charles, that's exactly the kind of information I was looking for.

BTW, I drive a Ford...Taurus. I don't know where I'm going with this but maybe it's time I stepped up my game.

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration