| Author | Message | ||
     Hornet Rating: N/A |
The new dual screen adapter Matrox DualHead2Go is able convert the analog VGA signal from virtual 2048x768 screen to dual analog 1024x768 displays. http://www.matrox.com/graphics/offhome/dh2go/home.cfm My idea is from 1 VGA output of my NV graphic card /adjusted of virtual screen 2048x768/ with 3d pageflipping stereo signal spliting of signal with DualHead2Go to 2 1024x768 signals with pageflipping stereo for 2 projectors. Is this real possible? | ||
| fmp_r Rating: N/A |
Why don't you use the NVidia stereo driver package and its dual VGA output option ? I guess you have an NV card incl. dual vga support. Normally standard. Therefore you don't need to think about that via a matrox solution. | ||
| Hornet Rating: N/A |
Problem is that only 1 monitor VGA output had on dual VGA card active pageflipping stereo (with consumer stereodrivers), second monitor had other part of horizontal spann desktop, only mono :-( and this vere possible resolving of this problem. | ||
| Alatar Rating: N/A |
Are try to have a multiscreen stereo presentation? If so, you will need a solution that includes genlocking so that the two images pageflip at the same time. I don't think what you are describing will provide this. If not, you only need one VGA output total, which is why your nVidia card only pageflips on one output port. | ||
| Alatar Rating: N/A |
Argghh... I wish this board had an edit function (yes, I did use preview, but I guess I'm blind...) Obviously, I meant "Are you trying to have a multiscreen stereo presentation?". Apologies for the confusion... | ||
| Dirkjan Rating: N/A |
Hi, I have the Matrox pherilia 128 Mb dual DVI and I want to play my 3d stereo movie through 2 LCD beamers. is this possible and how???? I can only play a movie on 1 full screen. Left or right. Thanks | ||
| Yuri Buyskikh (Yurab) New member Username: Yurab Post Number: 1 Registered: 5-2006  Rating: N/A |
I have the Matrox Parhelia 256 Mb (with genlock) and I am using one for the output stereomovie (selfmade) in page-flipping on THREE projectors BenQ 6210 (total resolution of picture is 3072x768(!) ). FREE YOUR MIND!!! | ||
| Alan Johnson (Ajay501) New member Username: Ajay501 Post Number: 2 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
Hi Hornet! Yes, it is possible! I am using the DualHead2Go to put pageflipped video on 2 CRT's with a combined 2048x768 resolution. I did benchmark tests on the system using two 6800XT cards in SLI mode. The test report is on http://www.3Dflightsim.com (Includes a clumsy photo of the setup)  >My idea is from 1 VGA output of my NV graphic card >/adjusted of virtual screen 2048x768/ with 3d >pageflipping stereo signal spliting of signal with >DualHead2Go to 2 1024x768 signals with pageflipping >stereo for 2 projectors. >Is this real possible? | ||
| Peter Žiak (Hornet) New member Username: Hornet Post Number: 19 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
Hurrrra I hope when this is true, my dream of flightsim with 120 gr or more FOV is then more real! 3D stereo with SLI- is this possible, the version of drivers is? I Condor soaring simulator fan (www.condorsoaring.com) | ||
| Peter Žiak (Hornet) New member Username: Hornet Post Number: 20 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
I think for months than Dual Head Matrox adapter is no compatible with good graphiccards and the software is no 3d compatible. Are the signals of CRTs totally synchronous? Have performed tests with DLP PJ s? Is this out of box solution, or is tweaking needed? | ||
| Peter Žiak (Hornet) Junior Member Username: Hornet Post Number: 21 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: |
The Matrox dual head adapter is in this time compatible with most NV Graphiccards! 3D stereo on 2CRTs or DLPs is possible! See http://www.matrox.com/graphics/offhome/support/dh2go/compatibility.cfm Hurra | ||
| Alan Johnson (Ajay501) New member Username: Ajay501 Post Number: 3 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: |
Hi Hornet! >>You asked: 3D stereo with SLI- is this possible? >>What version of drivers is? I am using version 92.18 NVidia drivers with the beta version 92.18 stereo driver. The stereo operated in perfect synchronization on the 2 crt diplays. However, you notice there is not any performance gain when SLI is engaged in Stereo, at least not with FS9. I expect that FSX and other future video games will gain from an SLI setup. As to the other question: I would say the setup is an "out of the box" solution. I did not have to do much tweaking except for learning how to install the Matrox drivers and how to operate them. I plan on using the system for 2 beamers (projectors) - but I think you would need to add a stereo projection converter to correct for reverse stereo. The earlier driver versions do seem to operate the setup in stereo, but they do not work well when SLI is engaged. Also, 3DMark crashes when the stereo is engaged - but the stereo works very well with FS9 and Trainz 2006. Cheers!  (Message edited by ajay501 on June 29, 2006) | ||
| Peter Žiak (Hornet) Junior Member Username: Hornet Post Number: 22 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: |
Hurra, wow, Is the picture quality on CRTs OK? Are you performed tests with beamers (1 beamer, 1CRT -pictue quality). I will buy this Dual headadapter, is no cheap, only real possible 3D stereo on 2 beamers.(Cheapest way for 140-150 FOV sim) SLI in this time had for 3D stereo no performace gain (drivers problem). and thx, thx. Your tests results are for my very serious. Hurra regards drom Slovakia. PS:This is my setup:  (Message edited by Hornet on March 03, 2007) | ||
| Michal Husak (Husakm) Junior Member Username: Husakm Post Number: 36 Registered: 4-2006  Rating: N/A |
The maximum refresh rate for the Matrox device is 85 Hz for low-res, 60 Hz for high-res. This is O.K. for LCD monitors and 2D, not for 3D and stereoscopy ... | ||
| Peter Žiak (Hornet) Junior Member Username: Hornet Post Number: 23 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
Hi, for my beamer (1024x768) is 85 Hz maximal refresh, this is max refresh of dual head adaptor in res 2048x768 (for my ideal).85 Hz refresh is not ideal, for my sims aplications in dark room no so bad. And the price is cca 1/10 of another solution of 3D 2048x768 projection. | ||
| Scott Warren (Cornucopiadm) New member Username: Cornucopiadm Post Number: 1 Registered: 7-2006 Rating: N/A |
Michal Husak wrote: "The maximum refresh rate for the Matrox device is 85 Hz for low-res, 60 Hz for high-res. This is O.K. for LCD monitors and 2D, not for 3D and stereoscopy ..." What you're saying is very true for an active display configuration, but not if you're using this for a passive (polarized) configuration. Since each monitor would be doing 60Hz (and, barring ghosting, would be giving 60Hz to each eye), that's the equivalent of an active system running at 120Hz! And an 85Hz setup would be giving you an equivalent of an active system running at 170Hz! Of course, then you would have to deal with all the calibration requirements, brightness and crosstalk issues, etc., but it still could be a workable situation for some. Scott | ||
| Peter Žiak (Hornet) Junior Member Username: Hornet Post Number: 25 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
Hi, have 85 Hz DLP active system, for home use in dark room excelent, absolutly minimally flicker, in this time ideal for home use (price/benefit ratio is high). Today i tested the possibility of rendering 2048x768 85Hz stereo with NV 6600 Diamond and tests are OK, rendering is possible, the FPS with Condor soaring sim are cca 27-30or higher FPS(in stereo) this is acceptable. I will in this time waiting with purchase of new Gcard (drivers). DualHead2Go is on way (2-3 weeks). The best Gcard NV for 3D stereo with full no problem functioning consumer 3D drivers is? | ||
| Michal Husak (Husakm) Junior Member Username: Husakm Post Number: 37 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
Scott Warren: I am not sure what do you say ... The Matrox device is useful only for active proejection so I am not sure what do you speak about. Can you, please, expalin your ideas ? (Message edited by husakm on July 09, 2006) | ||
| Maarten van Grinsven (Maart) New member Username: Maart Post Number: 1 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
this is interresting, what about dual-head graphicscard for passive 3d with nvidia driver, together with 2 th2go's from matrox. this could drive 6 beamers for 3 screens of passive 3d, can anybody tell me if the matrox th2go is compattible in this way? Maart | ||
| Michal Husak (Husakm) Junior Member Username: Husakm Post Number: 38 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
Maart: I undertand, you want to fork L and R outputs to multiple projectors ... Nice idea - but useles without edge blending and the projectors overlap. We had done a lot of experiemnts to overlap projectors mounted in very precise montage withotu edge blending - it does not work. The result looks very bad primary becous of non-uniform light intensity in the edge area (this is given by the total projection geometry) ... | ||
| Scott Warren (Cornucopiadm) New member Username: Cornucopiadm Post Number: 2 Registered: 7-2006 Rating: N/A |
Michal, I know you're not a fan of dual projector passive, but the fact is that it has been a successful option for quite a long time. Yes, there is non-uniform intensity (in all projectors-whether single or dual) and Yes, there are registration issues, but that doesn't mean the 3D effect is ruined, just that it isn't optimal. Scott | ||
| Michal Husak (Husakm) Junior Member Username: Husakm Post Number: 39 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
Scott: My company had made several passive intstalation and 90% intstalation done by Lightpseed (for witch I work as well) is passive. I am jsut only a fan of the best solution for the given problem. Nor active nor passive multi-projection do not work without edge blending. On the edges the light fall on the screen in different angle than in center. For silver screen with hig light gain it means up to 100% diference in reflected light intensity !!! The edge blending compensating for this is a total must (for both active and passive projection). Who had seen this in praxis knows what I speak about ... | ||
| Scott Warren (Cornucopiadm) New member Username: Cornucopiadm Post Number: 3 Registered: 7-2006 Rating: N/A |
I'm sorry. I do believe you know what you're talking about-when given the correct topic. I may have confused the issue of the Original Poster, as *I* was talking NOT about multi-projector panoramic projection, where I agree there would be a need for edge blending, etc., but simple 2 projector overlapped (co-located screen image) passive projection. While this is NEVER as sharp as single projector resolution, because of the differences in registration, etc., it is certainly very acceptable. Personally, I wouldn't fool with it in a mobile situation where one had to keep re-adjusting at every setup, but for fixed installations, it works perfectly well. Light falloff isn't that much of a problem either, especially if you cheat and throw the image slightly wider than the screen, using the screen edges or curtain to crop the outer rim. And I wasn't referring to extra-large screens either, just run-of-the-mill home theatre sized or small corporate audience sized screens. I'll make myself clearer next time... Scott | ||
| Michal Husak (Husakm) Junior Member Username: Husakm Post Number: 40 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
I was reacting on the Waren and Maarten idea (in posts before my) discusing multi (6) projector usage = big projection consiting from 3 panels systems = 2 overalps. To be honnest - this will be a nightmare for adjustmen .... | ||
| Maarten van Grinsven (Maart) New member Username: Maart Post Number: 2 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
the thing is will the nvidia drivers accept the alternative resolution of 3840x1024 and will it work with the th2go? will it show strange artifacts with the matrox surround gaming settings? will the outer left and outer right screen allign in 3D to the middle monitor? dont forget cave like displays are very expensive, but this would be "cheap" and great for hobbyists to do a homebrew semi cave setup, maybe using diy beamers. off course it will not be perfect becuase edgeblending isn't there but, you shouldn't compare this with a proffesional cave setup. (there is also no perspective corrected 6-dof position tracking for that matter) it will still be very cool for playing games if it works. just immagine playing WOW! the nvidia drivers supports a lot of games and so does matrox surround gaming, so this could be very cool and compatible system! I don't know about you Michal, but I'm realy exited about the possibilities of combining this matrox hardware with Nvidia's to see if we could get best of both worlds. greetings, Maart | ||
| Peter Žiak (Hornet) Junior Member Username: Hornet Post Number: 26 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
Hi Maarten see this http://www.3dflightsim.com/tests.htm The NV drivers are able rendering in 3D 2048x768 85Hz problemless. Matrox drivers for DualHead are compatible with all NV 3D stereo compatible cards. Matrox Triple head is problematic(60Hz refresh)Is possible installation of only 1 (dual or triple head )adapter on 1 Pc system. Also for 3D at 85 Hz is useable only DualHead2Go (2 CRTs or 2PJ 3D stereo on 85Hz). For my (and my budget) no bad. Additional software for edge blending vere good :-) | ||
| Maarten van Grinsven (Maart) New member Username: Maart Post Number: 3 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
"Is possible installation of only 1 (dual or triple head )adapter on 1 Pc system." I've read on the matrox forum that it might be possible to use multiple th2go's, but it is not supported by matrox, as far as I know the matrox th2go just fools the graphic card that 3 monitors are actualy 1 monitor, if this is the case 2 th2go's theoreticly could be used, with nvidia dual head output to get passive 3d. (three left signals on one vga port and 3 right signals on the other vga port) this way 60 Hz per eye is no problem and since it's all horizontal liniar polarisation shouldn't be a probem. Maart | ||
| Peter Žiak (Hornet) Junior Member Username: Hornet Post Number: 27 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
2x3 (passive dual VGA )output this is interesting, mayby only 1 Matrox drivers instalation, 2x dual chanel 3072x768 output, 2x triple head hardware and only 6 projectors? Interesting, for my too expensive. My DualHead2Go is on way, next posts after experiments. | ||
| Miguel A. Giménez (Darkbluesky) New member Username: Darkbluesky Post Number: 6 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
Maybe the worst difficulty for Hornet initial idea, is to find software that can run in 2048x768. Maybe FS or some other few ones can (I don't know), but does someone know if normal FPS (Half Life 2, CoD, CoD2, FarCry, etc) or other flight sims (IL2 Forgotten Battles, Pacific Fighters, Battle of Britain 2: WoV, Falcon 4, LockOn, etc) can do it? | ||
| Peter Žiak (Hornet) Junior Member Username: Hornet Post Number: 28 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
Hi, have tested on my graphiccard for my the most important application = Condor soaring simulator (with declaration in drivers 1. screen TV and 2048x768 res, 2. screen CRT monitor) and FPS in 3Dstereo (4xAA!) are cca 20, no so bad have 6600 Diamond graphic. FS2004 is running on 2048x768 problemless FPS see above. I think this is no probem. Waiting for Dual head 2Go is sooo long! | ||
| Miguel A. Giménez (Darkbluesky) New member Username: Darkbluesky Post Number: 7 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
In relation with the Matrox triple head, limited to 60 Hz, I wonder if it is not possible, in a n easy way, to duplicate each pair of frames so you have the same sequence and action speed, but at 120 Hz. And then project it via a three PJs (eventually DepthQ or other that was found to work at 120 Hz...), achieving a three 3D screen, and so avoiding the junction of both screens (when using only two) just in the middle of the point of view... About the synchronisation of the glasses, I think it would not be a problem that an easy home made electronic circuit couldn't solve. (Message edited by darkbluesky on July 13, 2006) | ||
| Miguel A. Giménez (Darkbluesky) New member Username: Darkbluesky Post Number: 8 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
Hi, I have been reading info on triple head at Matrox site http://www.matrox.com/graphics/offhome/th2go/tech_brief.cfm It seems that the usual (or allowed) resolution are, Supported resolution-----Equivalent to 3840 x 1024-------------3 x 1280 x 1024 3072 x 768--------------3 x 1024 x 768 2400 x 600--------------3 x 800 x 600 1920 x 480--------------3 x 640 x 480 According to Matrox, and if I am not wrong  they say that working with the maximum res allowed (3840 x 1024) at 60 Hz the RAMDAC should have an speed of 3840x1024x60=235929600Hz=236 MHz minimum. As many RAMDACs runs at 400 MHz it would be not a problem. By the same calculation if we stay with a more "modest" resolution (i.e. 1024x768) and using the THEORETICAL max value of 400 MHz of the RAMDAC, we will find that the maximum theoretical refresh rate is (400*1e6)/(3x1024x768)=170Hz. Which is more than enough. If I am not wrong this could mean that the triplehead maybe *could* be possible at high framerates... Another subject is the capacity of video cards to render at enough FPS in stereo so wide frame... (Message edited by darkbluesky on July 13, 2006) | ||
| Miguel A. Giménez (Darkbluesky) New member Username: Darkbluesky Post Number: 9 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
Even if the calculation of the last post is not completely correct, here there is an applet of Matrox to enable expanded modes in not-matrox cards: http://www.matrox.com/graphics/offhome/support/th2go/tmet.cfm 85 Hz is not the worst thing of the world...  (I still think that maybe it could go even higher though...) | ||
| Peter Žiak (Hornet) Junior Member Username: Hornet Post Number: 29 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
Rendering of 3d stereo 3072x768 or 2048x768 is no problem. many programs are problematic with 3072x768, here help the ini cfg modification. see atachments of 3d tests   | ||
| Miguel A. Giménez (Darkbluesky) New member Username: Darkbluesky Post Number: 10 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
Nice pics. If I was sure about the capacity of the Gfx card to render 3072x768 in stereo at good fps, I would go for a triple head. In my opinion it is more 'natural' and I do not have the joint of both screens just in front my nose... It is a real pity that stereo does not take any advantage of SLI or Quad-SLI systems...  Btw, have you tried to test it at 100-120 Hz (creating a new resolution mode)? I'm going to try to test it with my CRT and the soft of matrox EDIT: How can you test these resolutions? Do you have a triplehead device already? Or your CRT allows more than 1600 pixels width? I can't reproduce your test. (Message edited by darkbluesky on July 14, 2006) (Message edited by darkbluesky on July 14, 2006) | ||
| Peter Žiak (Hornet) Junior Member Username: Hornet Post Number: 30 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
Hi, in this time I have no Matrox device ( Dualhead2Go is on way). Have dovnloaded matrox software (drivers for dual and for triple head). Have my TV, and CRT 21"(max 1600x1200), Benq PB 6240. Have Triple head drivers installed, then config 3072x768, then TV as primary display config, and CRT as secondary. And then tested. Is little problematic, in one time this was succesfully. I think with device this vere more simplier (device give PC info of max resolution). Are accesorry software possibilities for triple head, for games modification (see Matrox homepage for triple head2Go). This all is exciting, but Condor no modificated runn only max 2048x768, I hope for change after modifications on 3072x768.Then I can the dualhead change for triplehead (only more 2PJ s!). Have no tested for 120Hz, the max Matrox refresh for 3072x768 (after modification for 3CRTs) is 85Hz. | ||
| Miguel A. Giménez (Darkbluesky) New member Username: Darkbluesky Post Number: 11 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
Hornet, I see that you have a 6600. I guess you have 2 outputs in it. You have connected the TV to primary and CRT to secondary (and the PJ remains not connected). Right? (Message edited by darkbluesky on July 14, 2006) | ||
| Peter Žiak (Hornet) Junior Member Username: Hornet Post Number: 31 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
Yes, can conect all 3 (TV, CRT, PJ) after config in NView only 2 are active (TV, CRT). Interesting is that I mus the settings repeated and in one time was active 3072x768 in 3D stereodrivers. NView vere clone mode. First are active the drivers of Triple head and I have configured new 3072x768 res. I hope with device this must by simplier (autodetect).Interresant-my CRT is able to display 3072x768! The image is croped, but sharp.System detected only 1600x1200and this is normal possible 3D setting. | ||
| Miguel A. Giménez (Darkbluesky) New member Username: Darkbluesky Post Number: 12 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
I don't have success. I have installed the triplehead drivers, but any software on the PC neither new options in nvidia panel appears...? After installing triplehead software, do you have some software of matrox that you can execute? | ||
| Peter Žiak (Hornet) Junior Member Username: Hornet Post Number: 32 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
I thing no other software (is possible of use this:http://www.matrox.com/graphics/offhome/support/th2go/tmet.cfm) is needed, after instalation it is possible creating of 3072x768 res. in drivers . | ||
| Peter Žiak (Hornet) Junior Member Username: Hornet Post Number: 34 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
Please see this: This was my dream and this is reality wow! http://www.3dflightsim.com/Dual_Projector_tests.htm Ayay 501 Congratulations!!!! /triple head tests were too interesting..../ I waiting for my Dual Head :-( | ||
| Alan Johnson (Ajay501) New member Username: Ajay501 Post Number: 4 Registered: 4-2006  Rating: N/A |
Thank you Hornet for the kind words. I hope you receive the Matrox DualHead soon. Here's an update regarding the 2 projector set up: 1) The setup only works at 75 Hz refresh rate at the 2048 x 768 resolution. I believe it is problem with the version 91.28 stereo driver. If I solve the problem and get the panoramic image to refresh at 85 Hertz (which should be possible) I will post the solution. 2) It is important to have the two projector images at exactly the same size where the two images meet. But this is not too much trouble. If one of the projectors is on a rollable cart this is very handy for adjusting the images. Good Luck! - Alan J. (Message edited by ajay501 on July 22, 2006) http://3DFlightSim.com | ||
| Miguel A. Giménez (Darkbluesky) New member Username: Darkbluesky Post Number: 13 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
Very nice layout. Thanks for posting! I wish you luck with the refresh rate. Have you tested it with previous driver versions? The screen at the right seems tilted horizontally. Is it true or it just seems to me? | ||
| Peter Žiak (Hornet) Junior Member Username: Hornet Post Number: 35 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
Hi, is this problem with refresh no from projectors (one from then = maximal refresh for this projector?)Have you created 2048x768x85 resolution ? (possible creating this and then reinstall drivers). With 77.77 and 3d 77.77 and my graphic have no problems in 85Hz refresh. I so excited, dual projector 3D setup is my dream. | ||
| Peter Žiak (Hornet) Junior Member Username: Hornet Post Number: 36 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
Hi DualHead2Go is arrived, first tests with 2 CRT monitors are OK, on 2 displays is 3D OK at 85 Hz!My favorite Condor soaring sim had no problems with rendering in 2048x768x85 res.(FPS 27-33 good). FS 2004 is problematic becose I have maximal settings, after lowering of settings it is better. Farcry at 2048x768 is in this time no funct. (I thing little tweaking is necessary).One problem is=with Matrox drivers at 2048x768 res are the stereo screenhots deformated and no usable. Interesting is in this res with Matrox drivers the testing picture of NV drivers is no functioning./No so big problem/. In 3 days I wil testing dual head with 2 projectors. | ||
| Peter Žiak (Hornet) Junior Member Username: Hornet Post Number: 37 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: |
One screenshot from soaring sim 2048x768 (only 2D) 3d screenhots with Matrox dual... are problematic.  | ||
| Miguel A. Giménez (Darkbluesky) New member Username: Darkbluesky Post Number: 14 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
Congrats! it seems very interesting and exciting! Waiting to hear from you about projectors test. | ||
| Peter Žiak (Hornet) Junior Member Username: Hornet Post Number: 38 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: |
Hi, after tests, here the pics, With DualHead2Go technically all is OK, refresh 85 Hz, no desynchronisation, no picture degradation, ideally for 2projector pageflipped stereo. Condor soaring sim in 3D cca 30 or more FPSwery good. The little color change L/R is becose lamp running time difference of projectors, with eye no so visible.   | ||
| Peter Žiak (Hornet) Junior Member Username: Hornet Post Number: 39 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
News little desynchronisations (short off of glasses)when the FPS is droping or fast movements are present can by totally removed with use of E-D activator please see: https://edimensional.com/support_updates.php | ||
| Triple D (Tripled) New member Username: Tripled Post Number: 1 Registered: 11-2006 Rating: N/A |
Has anyone had successed using triple head adaptor @ 85Hz (active stereo)? | ||
| Peter Žiak (Hornet) Member Username: Hornet Post Number: 55 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
Have no this info, theoretically with enhanced new software for 3 CRTs (at 85 Hz) this is possible (3x1024x768 85 Hz). The main problem is the compatibility of used software in this resolution and ev. deformation of picture in this resolution. With DualH2Go is 2 projector 3d stereo absolutly problemless at 85 Hz. Absolutly no picture qality degradation or deformation. I love Dual Head! | ||
| Triple D (Tripled) New member Username: Tripled Post Number: 2 Registered: 11-2006 Rating: N/A |
What about using stereoscopic player (peter wimmer) with 3 dlp's (3x1024x768 85 Hz) with triple head adaptor? Did someone try it? | ||
| Peter Žiak (Hornet) Member Username: Hornet Post Number: 56 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
Hi, have tested stereoscopic player from P.Wimmmer in 2048x768 resolution, have some problems, the stereo in this resolution is no working with stereodrivers from NVidia. (Is stereoplayer tweaking necessary?) I think upscaling to this big resolution is too expensive for normal PC. | ||
| Triple D (Tripled) New member Username: Tripled Post Number: 3 Registered: 11-2006 Rating: N/A |
Hornet: Did you get some kind of error? What are the specs of your PC? | ||
| Triple D (Tripled) New member Username: Tripled Post Number: 4 Registered: 11-2006 Rating: N/A |
Hornet: Have you tried it with lower resolutions? maybe 1600 x 600 (2 x 800 x 600)... | ||
| Triple D (Tripled) New member Username: Tripled Post Number: 5 Registered: 11-2006 Rating: N/A |
hornet: please test the StereoMoviePlayer http://stereo.jpn.org/eng/stvply/index.html Let me know your results | ||
| Peter Žiak (Hornet) Member Username: Hornet Post Number: 57 Registered: 4-2006 Rating: N/A |
Hi, In this time I little busy :-), I can performing the tests in 3-4 days. My PC is Athlon XP 3200+, 1G RAM, NV 6600 Diamond with DDR3 memory (500/1000 Mhz clocking), 160 GB HD. | ||
| Yuri Buyskikh (Yurab) Junior Member Username: Yurab Post Number: 25 Registered: 5-2006 Rating: N/A |
I'm using triple head videocard (not adaptor TripleHeadGo) Matrox Parhelia for page-flipping stereo on 85 Hz (three projectors BenQ 6210, total "physical" resolution 3072x768, screen aspect ratio 4:1). There is just one difficult: StereoscopicPlayer plays "movies" with max resolution 2000x500 per eye (Parallax Player - 2400x600), therefore i'm making "widescreen" movies in resolution 2000x500 ("not widescreen" movies for one projector in "native" resolution 1024x768).  FREE YOUR MIND!!! | ||
| Triple D (Tripled) New member Username: Tripled Post Number: 6 Registered: 11-2006 Rating: N/A |
Yuri: I read your post but you said you have some problems with your configuration (high movement scenes)... how critical is this? | ||
| Yuri Buyskikh (Yurab) Junior Member Username: Yurab Post Number: 26 Registered: 5-2006 Rating: N/A |
There are no problems with new driver and BIOS for Matrox Parhelia. I'm making "movies" in resolution 2000x500 and 15-20 fps (bitrate about 6-8 MByte/sec). The quality of picture is much better then 3D-DVD with resolution 720x240 and 30 fps .FREE YOUR MIND!!! | ||
| Francesco De Giorgio (Ciccilleju) New member Username: Ciccilleju Post Number: 1 Registered: 1-2007 Rating: N/A |
hello guys. i have a problem with dualhead2go. i bought it but when i tried to use it, i found this problem: i have 2 asus lcd 19" wide 16:10 with 1440x900 resolution.... this card doesn't support it! and i have to wait for dualhead2go digital edition.... does any1 know how to resolve this trouble? i'd like to use it, once i bought it!!! but the maximum resolution i can use is 1280x1024. matrox support desk told me to install the tmet utility...but it doesn't work with dualhead2go!!!! only with triple head! tell me what to do, i wasted 150 euros!! if possibile, please send suggestion to ciccilleju@hotmail.com |
