| Author | Message | ||
     VJocys Rating: N/A |
Why such simple and cheap technology (http://www.soft.lt/hardware/lcd/) is not used to add 3D for all LCD displays? What is wrong? | ||
| BOPrey Rating: N/A |
There is a thin "glass" between the light element and the surface of the LCD. The edges could not be polarized correctly. Also, trying to match the pixel size with the filter is also a problem as well. | ||
| VJocys Rating: N/A |
>>>There is a thin "glass" between the light element and the surface of the LCD>>Also, trying to match the pixel size with the filter is also a problem as well<<< I hope, today’s equipment is precisely enough to fix that problem easily. | ||
| VJocys Rating: N/A |
There is a thin "glass" between the light element and the surface of the LCD Maybe manufacturers can put outside polarizer under glass substrate. Also, trying to match the pixel size with the filter is also a problem as well I hope, today’s equipment is precisely enough to fix that problem easily. | ||
| Anonymous Rating: N/A |
Single sheet Polarizers are used that tend not to have lines on the actual sub pixel, but between them. This would not work with most LCD technologies, and will kill the image quality. Directional brightness enhancing films need a single polarization to work, with out them you need a much large back light and will have color shifts. Also addressing the pixels become a problem, as well as creating a solid image, the alignment is nontrival, and the brightness would be low. |
