Why weak 3D in lenticular ? Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

stereo3d.com webboard » General 3D Discussion » Why weak 3D in lenticular ? « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Anonymous

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, August 28, 2003 - 6:19 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint Post

Haven't seen satisfactory 3D lenticular images.

Is it because lenticular meterials have limitation to separate large parallax ?

I hear they use images of mutiple angles,say left 1, left 2, left3 and right 1, right2, right3 ,etc.,while some other 3D method like anaglyph can produce good quality 3D even when left1 and right 3 are combined( large parallax )
but they usually use left 1 and right 1( small parallax ) for lenticular 3D.

Is there any possible way to get a better quality of autostereo 3D picture, say any special lenticular materials or any other autostereo method ?

Please enlighten me about the above.

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration